navigation image mapNextPreviousTable of Contents

The concept of a "spectral signature", another name for a plot of the variations of reflected (or absorbed) EM radiation as function of wavelengths, gives rise to the widely used approach to identifying and separating different materials or objects using multispectral data obtained by remote sensors.

Electromagnetic Spectrum: Spectral Signatures

For any given material, the amount of solar radiation that reflects, absorbs, or transmits varies with wavelength. This important property of matter makes it possible to identify different substances or classes and separate them by their spectral signatures (spectral curves), as shown in the figure below. *

Typical continuous spectral curves or signatures of the four classes shown.

For example, at some wavelengths, sand reflects more energy than green vegetation but at other wavelengths it absorbs more (reflects less) than does the vegetation. In principle, we can recognize various kinds of surface materials and distinguish them from each other by these differences in reflectance. Of course, there must be some suitable method for measuring these differences as a function of wavelength and intensity (as a fraction of the amount of irradiating radiation). Using reflectance differences, we can distinguish the four common surface materials (GL = grasslands; PW = pinewoods; RS = red sand; SW = silty water), shown in the next figure. Please note the positions of points for each plot as a reflectance percentage for just two wavelengths (refer to figure below).

Two-dimensional plot in spectral reflectance space of the values for the 4 classes shown in the previous illustration.

When we use more than two wavelengths, the plots in multi-dimensional space tend to show more separation among the materials. This improved ability to distinguish materials due to extra wavelengths is the basis for multispectral remote sensing (discussed on the following page).

I-11: Referring to the above spectral plots, which region of the spectrum (stated in wavelength interval) shows the greatest reflectance for a) grasslands; b) pinewoods; c) red sand; d) silty water. At 0.6 micrometers, are these four classes distinguishable? ANSWER

I-12: Which material in these plots is brightest at 0.6 micrometers; which at 1.2 micrometers? ANSWER

I-13 Using these curves, estimate the approximate values of % Reflectance for rock (sand), water, and vegetation (choose grasslands) at two wavelengths: 0.5 and 1.1 micrometers, putting their values in the table provided below. Then plot them as instructed on the lower diagram. Which class is the point at X in this diagram most likely to belong? (Note: you may find it easier to make a copy of the diagram on tracing paper.) ANSWER

Framework for recording and plotting values for the reflectances of the 3 indicated classes at the two wavelengths indicated. If need be, print this figure out.

I-14: Presume that two unknown surface features in an image or photo, which actually are a forest and a field crop with the plants close-spaced, are measured for their spectral values, and both display quite similar reflectances at three chosen wavelengths. How might these be separated and perhaps even identified? (Hint: think spatially.) ANSWER

* The subject of spectral curves or plots and the principles of spectroscopy in general, as well as a survey of imaging spectroscopy and hyperspectral remote sensing, are explored in greater detail in Section 13 (pages 13-5 through 13-10). Also treated in that part of Section 13 is a brief review of the concept of "spectral resolution".

navigation image mapNextPrevious

Primary Author: Nicholas M. Short, Sr. email: